Modern Family
Upper and middle-class
families in urban areas of Iran are caught between the pull of
traditional religion and culture and a change toward more Western
patterns in family relationships. The development of mass
media and modern schools has changed the attitudes of urban
children toward traditional values. These influences have
also altered family relationships and the function of the family
in the society at large. However, these modern developments
have not penetrated all levels of society, and the traditional
forces remain strong. In the villages, the family still retains
its function of educating children and transmitting cultural roles
and values. Also among urban families who have not been
exposed to Western education, literature, or movies, life
remains essentially the same. (Interestingly, a trend toward
traditionalism grew through the middle 1970s in the midst of
Westernization.)
The major effects of
industrialization and urbanization on the modern family have been
the weakening of parental authority and the increased freedom of
choice of marriage partners. As offspring loosen the ties
with the traditional norms and values, they often experience
conflict between their desires for independence and their strong
sense of duty toward their fathers.
Among the upper and
middle classes, married men tend to set up households separate
from their families of origin, perhaps even in a different
neighborhood. But ties remain and visits are frequent.
The attitude toward women remains conservative, and premarital sex
in not common. The spouse is usually chosen from the same
social group, though now often without the interference of
parents. Sometimes parents are only notified of the decision
to marry, but their approval is sought and Mehr is still
guaranteed. Clearly the traditional customs coexist with
modern values.
Western education and
travel abroad have profoundly changed the role of women and have
resulted in demands for change in family relationships. More
women have sought higher education, and currently 37% of all
university students in Iran are women (this has changed
dramatically. editor.) During the 1960s many women sought
employment outside of the home. The majority, however, do
not contribute much to the finances of the family (this is changed
too.) Women in modern families marry at a later age than
their traditional counterparts; and with no servants, child
caretakers, and housekeepers, they have fewer children. It
must be realized, however, that even though a portion of women
have become educated and emancipated, traditional culture has a
strong grip and sex roles are enormously difficult to
change. The modern Iranian woman appears to have adjusted
well to the dual role and, therefore, male-female conflicts are
minimized.
The Western influence and
break with tradition have caused families to become more oriented
toward the nuclear family and have led to a partial breakdown of
the extended family. Consequently, family members have
become conflicted about their obligations and sense of responsibility
toward elders.
The modern urban family
encounters many stresses that threaten its stability.
Cultural standards of social behavior are abandoned in favor of
Western norms of more freedom of expression. There is a
striving and com0etition to achieve more status and wealth.
The father may resent the fact that his children do not respect
his authority in the same way that he responded toward his own
parents. He may also have ambivalent feelings toward his
professional wife.
When there is family
tension because of emotional distance or physical separation from
the extended family, either the extended family may become
hesitant to provide support and advice or the nuclear family may
be reluctant to assume a dependent position and seek advice from
them.
Immigration
Modes of Adaptation
Different modes of
adaptation of migrant ethnic families have been described elsewhere.
Winthrop and Gaviria (1975) have described other modes in a study
of immigrant Peruvian physicians in the United States. The
mode of adaptation to the new culture among Iranian families
vacilitates between acculturation and holding onto the old
culture. Iranians, at times, preserve aspects of their
culture no matter how Westernized they have become in appearance,
mode of thinking, behavior, and language. It is not yet
clear how these patterns will develop over several generations in
the United States. the number of second-generation Iranian
adults is till small, and it is therefore hard to comment on
this. The most common modes of adaptation are the following:
1. Denigrating the old
culture. Some families sever the old ties, avoid
Iranians, and denounce the old traditions and beliefs. This
amounts to an effort to deny their cultural origin by adopting the
external features of a stereotyped American. Habits and
perceived values (often materialistic)may often be copied.
2. Denying the new
culture. The new becomes so frightening that the old
cannot be abandoned. Families turn inward, associating only
with Iranians and attempting to reproduce a micro culture similar
to the one in the home country. They eat the same foods,
follow the same traditions, and criticize the Western culture's
values and belief systems. However, the children in these
families, due to contact with the outside world through schools
and friends, become acculturated and conflicts frequently develop
in the next generation.
3. Biculturation.
This is perhaps the best mode of adaptation. The family
attempts to bring the two cultures together and tolerates the
conflict and anxiety of crossing the cultural boundaries.
Important attachments to the old vulture are maintained along with
a productive assimilation of the new culture. The old ways
are not totally abandoned; rather the family attempts to blend the
best of two worlds and incorporates the old with the new.
Therefore, they can integrate without disrupting their basic sense
of identity.
Often some family members
adhere to one mode of adaptation while the other members are using
another mode. In these instances, the family becomes
especially prone to internal conflicts across generations.
Modes of Adaptation to
the United States..................Continued on the next issue.
|