The life of Taj al-Saltana, daughter of the ruler of Iran, Naser
al-Din Shah Qajar, epitomized the predicaments of her changing era.
Overcoming her limited education within the harem walls, Taj
chronicled a thirty-year span in the life of a generation that
witnessed a shift from traditional order to revolutionary flux. It is
as though she had chosen this moment to recall her personal history--a
tale filled with "wonder and anguish"--in order to record a
cultural and political leap, symbolic of her time, from the indulgent,
sheltered, and often petty world of her father's harem to the puzzling
and exposed, yet emotionally and intellectually challenging world of a
new Iran.
Now almost one hundred years later Taj's memoirs are relevant and
qualify her not only as a feminist by her society's standards but also
in comparison with feminists of her generation in Europe and America.
Beyond her fascination for the material glamors of the West at the
turn of the twentieth century--fashion, architecture, furniture, the
motorcar--she was also influenced by Western culture's painting,
music, history, literature and language. And yet throughout this time
she kept her bond with her own literary and cultural heritage and what
she calls her "Persianness."
Despite her troubled life of agony--an unloving and harsh mother; a
benevolent but self-indulgent father; an adolescent, bisexual husband;
separation from her children; financial difficulties; the stigma of
leading a libertine lifestyle and the infamy of removing her veil--Taj's
is a genuine voice for women's social grievances in late 20th-century
Iran, and one that reveals a remarkable woman in her own right.
Center for Iranian Research and Analysis
This book consists of two parts. The first hundred pages are an
introduction by Abbas Amanat. The second part is the translation of
Taj Al-Saltana's memoirs by Vanzan and Neshati.
Taj Al Saltana was one of daughter's of Naser al-Din Shah Qajar. She
lived in the Shah's harem until the age of thirteen when she was
married and sent off to her fatherinlaw s residence. This book is the
collection of Taj's childhood and adolescent memories. She provides a
vivid picture of her childhood, her relationships with her father, the
shah who loved her, her mother who did not show any affection towards
her, her nanny, and the rest of her cohabitants in the harem. Living
in the harem, she provides a valuable account of its socioeconomic
life. Women's relationships with each other, with the Shah and with
their male trustees are described very well. Taj presents a refreshing
view of how the Qajar dynasty operated the country's affairs. The
corruption of the bureaucracy, foreign intervention, and the royal
courts' inability to deal with socioeconomic changes are all aspects
of Qajar rule that Taj explains in her memoirs.
Taj's memories of her own personal life and the life of her
cohabitants in the harem disclose how the traditional royalty of Iran
managed their life. She was a melancholic and distressed princess who
had the economic opportunity by virtue of being one of the Shah's
daughters to become educated in literature and philosophy. This became
a source of both her happiness and anguish. While she is critical of
socioeconomic and political aspects of Iranian society as well as
patriarchal arrangements, she remains docile and subjects herself to
exploitative relationships. This contradiction haunts her until her
premature death. Her childhood memories of harem life demystify
Western accounts of mysterious Persian women. Unintentionally she
discloses an important socioeconomic relationship between the royal
court and the commoners. She explains that many of the Shah's wives
were from low income classes. For those young women to marry the Shah
was to liberate themselves from harsh economic reality. Taj is more
critical of the women of the harem and how vicious they were towards
each other rather than being critical of her father and his unlimited
lust for young women. It seems as if she accepted her fathers'
mischiefs as inherent rights of the monarch. Her criticisms of
socioeconomic and political problems are directed at the Shah's
associates and vazirs and not at the Shah himself. The oppression of
women is explained as a cultural problem. Her admiration of European
life styles and the women's suffragist movement is quite similar to
those modernists of her time as well as the contemporary secular
intelligentsia. She sees veiling as the most problematic aspect of
women's oppression. For her unveiling is the dynamic force for women's
liberation. She says "The sources of the ruination of the
country, the cause of its moral laxity, the obstacle to its
advancement in all areas, is the veiling of women.... The veiling of
women in this country has spawned and spread thousands upon thousands
of corrupt and immoral tendencies." She admires the relationships
between women and men in the villages who work side by side on the
farm. She appreciates unveiled farm women and their productive role
yet while she unveiled herself she chose not to be economically
productive all her life. Throughout the book the contradiction between
her knowledge and criticism of sociocultural aspects and her actions
and life style is clearly manifested. While she is rightfully critical
of Iranian socioeconomic and cultural factors, she continued to play
her traditional role. Tai does not mention her public role as an
agitator for women's liberation or an organizer for any type of
women's organization. It seems as if she saw women's liberation as a
move from unveiling to wearing western clothing and corsets which is
as problematic as wearing a veil. Taj 's memories are a sad story of a
woman who reached a certain degree of political and sexual
consciousness yet lived and died inside the walls of prisons built by
patriarchal values and practices. Her love affairs were not signs of
liberation but anger and rebellion against those walls which finally
crushed her without being slightly scratched.
In the introduction Amanat introduces Taj as a representative of the
emerging secular intelligentsia and a feminist in the aftermath of the
Constitutional Revolution. Amanat describes the historical account and
the political characters of the time very interestingly. However,
Amanat's understanding and interpretation of Taj's memories is painted
with his own wish thinking on the question of secularism as a solution
sociopolitical problems and Shi'i Islam as the obstacle to
sociopolitical reforms. He believes that the restrictions which have
been imposed on women attest to the persistence or revival of old
religious values a institutions. He says "The plight of today's
Muslim women remains strikingly and sadly comparable to that of Taj a
century ago." The most problematic of Amanat interpretations of
Taj is his failure to briefly explain the patriarchal system which
existed all along and was then encouraged by Muslim male elite. He
does not mention the status of and limitations placed on nonMuslim
women who lived under the same patriarchal system. His views on
secularism and Islam related to women liberation do not allow him to
explore either the patriarchal exploitation of women or the
socioeconomic problems in their own light. Amanat clearly views women
as passive objects rather than as agents of social and political
change who may maintain or change patriarchal relationships. In
contrast, the class base of an individual has a profound impact on how
she perceive herself in relation to her immediate environment. This is
manifested in Taj's account of the royal household. A decadent,
backward, yet self indulgent Qajar dynasty must be seen in its own
light. The most simple paradigm for explaining socioeconomic and
political ills of Iranian society is the analysis provided by
intelligentsia which diagnoses Islam as the infective agent. To cure
the problem, secularism is the remedy.
A short note on the translation is necessary order to clarify some
misunderstandings. Fix throughout the book, when Taj speaks of God
translation refers to it as He which is specific Christianity. In
Farsi God does not connote a gender specific entity. Second, several
words-en'san, a'dl and ba'sSlar-all of which refer to humankind in
Farsi are translated as man and mankind which again is gender
specific. These criticisms aside, we should be grateful the
translators and Amanat for bringing this work before the public.
Habibi: A Journal for Lovers of
Middle-Eastern Dance and Arts
Several books written by children of Qajar (19th century Iranian)
royalty have been published in recent years. Crowning Anguish is, to
my mind, the book most likely to be of interest to Habibi readers. It
is an extraordinary memoir written by Taj al-Saltana, daughter of
Naser al-Din Shah (ruled 1848-1896), the fourth king of the Qajar
dynasty (1785-1925). Born in 1884, Taj's life spans the dying decades
of Qajar rule and its ultimate end, first in the Constitutional
Revolution of 1906, and in the takeover of Reza Shah Pahlavi in 1925.
The memoir is in the form of a tale told to her teacher in
explanation of some of her behavior and life choices; it chronicles,
from the perspective of a child and young woman in her father's, and
later her husband's, anderun (private family quarters), a period of
turmoil and change in late nineteenth, early twentieth century Iranian
history. In it, Taj gives fascinating glimpses of Qajar court life,
the intrigues, dangers, liaisons, and struggles for control.
Among the most interesting aspects of the memoir are Taj's
education and feminism. She received some private tutoring in the
anderun, but was largely self-educated, and read voraciously from
classical and contemporary European literature in translation. As a
result, she developed a notion that the best path for Iranian families
would be for Iranian women to discard the veil, and receive education
sufficient to allow them to work outside the home. Her view was that
by doing so couples could choose to marry for love, thus reducing the
many social ills that result from arranged marriages, such as marital
infidelity and divorce. Women could contribute to the family and
national economies, rather than staying at home bored and getting into
trouble.
While the memoir focuses on Taj's life, it depicts vividly some of
the most interesting political events of late-nineteenth,
early-twentieth century Iran, which are oddly reminiscent of events of
more recent times. In particular, the call during anti-crown protests
of 1891-92 for the overthrow of the Shah and the raising of the
highest Shi'ite leader to the position of "Supreme Exemplar"
seem to mirror the events leading to the (counter-) revolution of
1979.
Dancers and musicians do not appear to advantage in these memoirs.
Taj's own attitudes accurately reflect the general attitude towards
professional Performers, though perhaps colored by the fact that her
own husband had affairs with one of the dancing girls from the
visiting Russian circus, and also with a male dancer. During the reign
of Taj's brother, Mozaffar al-Din Shah, the family was shocked by the
"constant coming and going of female musicians, and prostitutes
who disguised themselves as musicians." Taj compares this with
the situation during her father's life: "I could not remember
female musicians in my father's harem, with the exception of wedding
feasts, and then it was only male musicians. It was impossible to find
a single whore among them." Taj describes a boy dancer:
"Renowned throughout the town, the boy had a thousand adoring
lovers. Being a dancer, however, he was unworthy of being anyone's
beloved."
Taj herself was (in her own estimation) an accomplished musician;
but, since she restricted her musical performances to her own
amusement, she escaped the censure heaped upon professionals. She
studied tar (Persian long-necked lute) with Mirza Abdollah, one of the
great performers of the Qajar era; she claims that her tar-playing
skills soon surpassed those of her teacher! She was, apparently, much
admired (but not for her music!) by one of the greatest of
contemporary Iranian composers, 'Aref-e Qazvini, whose rakish
photograph also appears in the book.
The book begins with a 100-page introduction by Abbas Amanat that
provides a fine description of the historical context of the memoirs;
most of the terminology, personalities, and cultural tidbits needed to
follow the memoirs are included. The book involves a long list of
dramatis personae; an alphabetized set of biographical sketches of
each of the major characters is provided at the end, and is a big
help. The reader new to things Iranian might do well to read it
immediately after the introduction, before going on to the memoir
itself.
The illustrations of Crowning Anguish alone would make the book of
great interest to aficionados of Middle Eastern history, culture, and
arts. It includes many photographs and paintings of Iranian court
ladies in their shalite (short skirt) attire, as well as depictions of
court life, palaces, and ministers. Among my favorites are the etching
of a Persian woman in shalite on page 26, the etching of Ziba Khanum
in shalite on page 31, the famous posed photograph of 'Aref on page
57, and the mid-life photo of Taj herself in European dress on page
311.
Of the handful of surviving memoirs from late nineteenth century
Qajar Persia perhaps those of Taj al-Saltaneh, daughter of Nasser
alDin Shah Qajar, has stirred the greatest amount of interest among
historians and general readers alike. Due to a resurgent curiosity
about harem life, and capturing the imaginations of modern Western
feminists, Taj's rather fragmented and slim autobiography has seen
several translations and numerous analyses in recent times. Despite
certain textual inconsistencies and questions regarding its
authenticity, one reads the memoirs with an overriding sense of
peering into a littleknown world, deprived as we are of firsthand
accounts relating to that period, and to women of Taj's circumstances.
In somewhat unusual and cumbersome style, Taj's memoirs, written in
1914, cover a thirty-year span of a rapidly changing era. She takes us
from the sheltered comfort of the opulent Qajar court under its most
charismatic ruler, to the disheartening close of the Constitutional
Revolution, with its shattered illusions and unanswered questions. She
relates her life of troubled agony an unloving and harsh mother, a
benevolent but selfindulgent father; an adolescent, bisexual husband,
separation from her children, financial difficulties, the stigma of
leading a libertine's life: all bear witness to the contradictions of
women's predicaments in changing times. As if to echo this
"anguish", she embodies in her own personal history the rise
and fall of dreams, and the frailty of the human condition.
Our introduction to harem existence begins with her childhood
memories, which ironically reinforce orientalist accounts of a
comically puerile atmosphere generated by idle women and a whimsical
but omnipotent ruler. The emphasis on the freakishness of harem
customs, as opposed to its structure and hierarchy (of which we know
from other sources), leads us to believe that she deliberately wrote
for an audience, and with a view to justifying her ideas on women, as
well as certain elements of her later demise.
Amanat's superb preface, contextualizing an otherwise limited account
for the uninitiated, points to the strong influence of contemporary
translations and other European literature available to women of Taj's
aristocratic upbringing. The spirit of European romanticism, a
penchant for melodrama and typical nineteenthcentury female
"hysteria" pervade much of Taj's writing on her personal
circumstances, allowing her to lapse into self-righteousness and
selfpity side by side with her insightful analysis of the condition of
Persian women. Metaphors on the "darkness of the harem",
"bondage of half the nation's population" and mothers as
educators of future generations are strongly reminiscent of missionary
discourse of the time, an element which colours her writing with a
certain critical detachment. Her iconoclastic style confirms her as an
anomaly, an outsider from within, who from her privileged position
felt entitled to denounce many of the ageold traditions sustaining
herself and her culture, yet without which she felt diminished and
tortured, neither the enlightened and liberated persona of a George
Sand, nor the firmly rooted RezaShahstyle feminist trendsetter.
A curious blend of the reconstructive and reflective, Taj al
Saltaneh's memoirs bring home the intense conflicts of a life
straddling the harem and modernism. Sadly, she sees her initiation
into "knowledge" as the source of her demise, partly
machinated by destructive forces in an attempt to "toss our
happy, free lives into a fresh perplexity and turmoil".
With a translation that only occasionally stumbles in rendering a
difficult text, the publishers have succeeded in producing a handsome
volume well stocked with plates and illustrations (although
Sevruguine's remarkable photos are conspicuously absent). Amanat's
useful historical sketch enables the book to be appreciated by the
general reader as well as the student, reminding us yet again,
however, by means of ample glossaries, notes, biographies and so on,
of the inevitable need to make one wellknown, aspect of a Middle
Eastern culture familiar to the West.